Is PPTP trustable

Point to Point Tunneling Protocol also known as PPTP is VPN implementation method that is no longer implemented. There are many reasons for this and the main one is the security flaws that were detected over time. This leads us to ask question that whether PPTP is secure? The answer is simply no. With the development of new and more advanced technologies in VPN field PPTP is obsolete. Today cyber security is directly related to VPN and both are incomplete without each other. However when developed it was considered to be the securest protocol of its time. Some protocols that are used to make up PPTP are as follows:

  • MS-CHAP V1
  • MPPE or Microsoft Point to Point Encryption
  • RC4
  • DES keys

On the special websites with reviews and guides like those articles about best VPN services on there is info on different kind of protocols and difference between them.

Development and implementation

VPN is not a new phenomenon at all. It has remained in one form or another and development is done to take it to the next level. It was Windows 95 and NT where PPTP was encrypted by Microsoft. However it was not until 1998 that the vulnerabilities in PPTP were discovered. In November same year during the ACM conference it was revealed that PPTP is not secure anymore. At this conference Bruce Schneier demonstrated how CHAP and MPPE that is an RC4 encryption protocol may be broken.

It is all about security not communication

Cyber security is a hot topic and it has remained so in the past years. When it comes to PPTP the fact is that people completely forget about communication and all they want is their privacy secured. It was in 2012 that live demonstration of decryption of PPTP was once again done. It was shown that tools available to anyone can be used to destroy PPTP completely. One of the major issues with this protocol was that once issues caused were never fixed and therefore the vulnerabilities exposed remain as they are.

Vulnerabilities with PPTP

There are many issues and flaws with PPTP and the main ones are listed as under:

  • MS-CHAP V1 is used as the base protocol of PPTP. Common and most importantly free tools can be used to obtain the desired information from an exchange and implement it to hack into the network.
  • Dictionary attacks can be performed on the network by processing the information packets captured. The tools that are required to perform the actions are largely available and are becoming fatal.
  • Bit flipping is another attack that can be performed with ease. It can be regarded as the deadliest attack. The information flowing through the stream can be manipulated as required. The worst part is that attacker can never be identified at all.


There are many new VPN technologies that can be used to get the work done. PPTP should be dumped as it is vulnerable can bring in serious dangers. From authentication to implementation this protocol is no worth it and therefore it should be disregarded. SSTP, open VPN and L2TP/IPSec are the other forms of VPN that should be used and they get the best results overall. These VPN terminologies are also regarded as safe and secure.


New Claiming Compensation Rules Explained

It is oftentimes believed that no win no fee rules, subjected to a range of changes, offer a more rigid policy as for personal injury compensation. Unfortunately, the changes may seem really tough to comprehend, and a simple and brief explanation is something that people are typically looking for. Therefore, the article aims at providing guidance on how the new legislation is functioning.

In the past, an injury, suffered by an individual through the fault of his/her own., e.g. in a public place, enabled the injured party to claim for a full compensation in accordance with a No-Win No-Fee procedure. Therefore, the legislature implied paying an extra fee to a solicitor in case the claim was a success. Thus, a success must have been paid to a solicitor by the insurance company; while an injured party received the compensation to the full.

However, the Government has introduced a series of changes and the 100% compensation good times sank into oblivion. It was decided to limit a success fee and make it a part of the compensation paid by insurance enterprises. The changes provoked a reduction in the number of solicitor offers, caused by unwillingness to pick up the cases due to the potential risk of losing the total amount of the reward through various legal costs. Even taking into account the fact that a solicitor’s success fee may equal up to 25%, taking up the case is still a risky affair.

This way or the other, no win no fee in a modified form exits till nowadays: go to Solicitors Guru to find a solicitor, comprehensive database of legal firms and enterprises, and filter the results by ‘no win no fee’ and you’ll see the option is still there. At the website you will also find a lot of useful info on the matter of no win no fee funding arrangements.

In its turn the Government motivates its action by a permanently increasing number of bogus accident claims, and taking into consideration their nature pursuing a claim was as easy as ABC. As a result, the move will provide insurance businesses with a windfall, as these establishments have their premiums collected and calculated already.